A Change in Tactics ...

Guest

Hi all

As everyone knows, LC banned the fortifications of all kinds for his troops at Isandhlwana ...

But Wood has fortified his camp in anticipation of a possible attack ...

What day, Wood has it been notified of the massacre of Isandhlwana and it's LC which is really neat or authorized Wood to fortify his camp? ...

Cheers

PTR

Posts : 2593 Join date : 2009-04-24

Pascal wrote:: As everyone knows, LC banned the fortifications of all kinds for his troops at Isandhlwana ...

You certainly have away with words. :p;:

Guest

For Chelmsfordthescapegoat

LC banned laagers ,but laagers are considered as field fortifications in a military campaigns

Posts : 627 Join date : 2009-01-20 Age : 46

Only applies to Isandlwana. But there was no need to laager until the 22nd, when LC wasn't there!

Guest

For sas1

Yes Well, this stuff is not decided and will not turn up at the last minute!

Guest

In fact, because of the Battle of Centane, the British overestimated the power of the MH, which is why, LC thought laagers were obsolete ...As for regulation, with it, it is not even a question of infantry square ...

The defeat of Isandhlwana helped avoid a lot of disasters in colonial wars that took place then ...

Subject: Re: A Change in Tactics ... Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:29 am

Chelmsford declined to larger. Chelmsord banned fortifications.

Thats one small step for man..................................................

Guest

That's one small step for man and a chance for the Zulu Very Happy

» The best tactics against the Zulus?
» Punch's view of Chelmsford's tactics!