WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM

Film Zulu. Lieutenant John Chard: The army doesn't like more than one disaster in a day. Bromhead: Looks bad in the newspapers and upsets civilians at their breakfast.
 
HomeHome  GalleryGallery  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Latest topics
» H.M.S. Forester
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyToday at 4:07 pm by johnex

» Royal Marine Light Infantry, Chatham
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyToday at 3:45 pm by johnex

» Colonel Edward William Bray, 2nd/4th Regt.
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 8:49 pm by John Young

» Did Ntishingwayo really not know Lord C wasn't at home
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 10:53 am by Julian Whybra

» Samuel Popple
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 8:43 am by STEPHEN JAMES

» Studies in the Zulu War volume VI now available
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySat Nov 09, 2024 6:38 pm by Julian Whybra

» Colonel Charles Knight Pearson
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 08, 2024 5:56 pm by LincolnJDH

» Grave of Henry Spalding
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Nov 07, 2024 8:10 pm by 1879graves

» John West at Kambula
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Nov 07, 2024 5:25 pm by MKalny15

» Private Frederick Evans 2/24th
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Nov 03, 2024 8:12 pm by Dash

» How to find medal entitlement Coker
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Nov 03, 2024 10:51 am by Kev T

» Isandlwana Casualty - McCathie/McCarthy
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySat Nov 02, 2024 1:40 pm by Julian Whybra

» William Jones Comment
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 01, 2024 6:07 pm by Eddie

» Brother of Lt Young
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 01, 2024 5:13 pm by Eddie

» Frederick Marsh - HMS Tenedos
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 01, 2024 9:48 am by lydenburg

» Mr Spiers KIA iSandlwana ?
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 01, 2024 7:50 am by Julian Whybra

» Isandhlwana unaccounted for casualties
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 01, 2024 7:48 am by Julian Whybra

» Thrupps report to Surgeon General Wolfies
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Oct 31, 2024 12:32 pm by Julian Whybra

» Absence of Vereker from Snook's Book
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Oct 25, 2024 10:59 pm by Julian Whybra

» Another Actor related to the Degacher-Hitchcock family
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Oct 21, 2024 1:07 pm by Stefaan

» No. 799 George Williams and his son-in-law No. 243 Thomas Newman
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySat Oct 19, 2024 12:36 pm by Dash

» Alphonse de Neuville- Painting the Defence of Rorke's Drift
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Oct 18, 2024 8:34 am by Stefaan

» Studies in the Zulu War volumes
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Oct 16, 2024 3:26 pm by Julian Whybra

» Martini Henry carbine IC1 markings
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Oct 14, 2024 10:48 pm by Parkerbloggs

» James Conner 1879 clasp
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Oct 14, 2024 7:12 pm by Kenny

» 80th REG of Foot (Staffords)
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Oct 13, 2024 9:07 pm by shadeswolf

» Frontier Light Horse uniform
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Oct 13, 2024 8:12 pm by Schlaumeier

» Gelsthorpe, G. 1374 Private 1/24th / Scott, Sidney W. 521 Private 1/24th
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Oct 13, 2024 1:00 pm by Dash

» A Bullet Bible
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySat Oct 12, 2024 8:33 am by Julian Whybra

» Brothers Sears
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Oct 11, 2024 7:17 pm by Eddie

» Zulu War Medal MHS Tamar
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Oct 11, 2024 3:48 pm by philip c

» Ford Park Cemetery, Plymouth.
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Oct 08, 2024 4:15 pm by rai

» Shipping - transport in the AZW
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Oct 06, 2024 10:47 pm by Bill8183

» 1879 South Africa Medal named 1879 BAR
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Oct 06, 2024 12:41 pm by Dash

» A note on Captain Norris Edward Davey, Natal Volunteer Staff.
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Oct 06, 2024 12:16 pm by Julian Whybra

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
November 2024
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 
CalendarCalendar
Most active topics
Durnford was he capable.1
Durnford was he capable. 4
Durnford was he capable.5
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Isandlwana, Last Stands
The ammunition question
Durnford was he capable. 3
Durnford was he capable.2
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
The missing five hours.
Most Viewed Topics
Please Do Not Post Ads on Our Forum
Google Chrome new standards imposed
Isandlwana, Last Stands
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
In deference to other online platforms discussing the history of the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879
The missing five hours.
ISANDLWANA SURVIVIORS
The ammunition question
Recent Members To The ZULU WAR 1879 Discussion & Reference Forum ( A Small Victorian War in 1879)
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Top posting users this month
Julian Whybra
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
Tig Van Milcroft
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
SRB1965
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
warrior3
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
John Young
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
Eddie
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
MKalny15
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
STEPHEN JAMES
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
lydenburg
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
Tim Needham
The ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 2 BarThe ammunition question - Page 2 Bar_right 
New topics
» Colonel Edward William Bray, 2nd/4th Regt.
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyYesterday at 8:49 pm by John Young

» Samuel Popple
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Nov 12, 2024 3:36 pm by STEPHEN JAMES

» Colonel Charles Knight Pearson
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 08, 2024 5:56 pm by LincolnJDH

» John West at Kambula
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 04, 2024 11:54 pm by MKalny15

» How to find medal entitlement Coker
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 01, 2024 9:32 am by Kev T

» Frederick Marsh - HMS Tenedos
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Oct 31, 2024 1:42 pm by lydenburg

» Did Ntishingwayo really not know Lord C wasn't at home
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Oct 28, 2024 8:18 am by SRB1965

» Thrupps report to Surgeon General Wolfies
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Oct 27, 2024 11:32 am by SRB1965

» Brother of Lt Young
The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySat Oct 26, 2024 9:52 pm by Eddie

Similar topics
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying.
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address. Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.  If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.  We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes. There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site. The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum. The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. 
Fair Use Notice
Fair use notice. This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website. If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
 

 The ammunition question

Go down 
+14
Ulundi
impi
Chelmsfordthescapegoat
John
Dave
old historian2
rusteze
24th
cetewayo
ymob
Frank Allewell
6pdr
littlehand
Julian Whybra
18 posters
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
AuthorMessage
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyFri Jun 27, 2014 4:24 pm

Its something that's been kicked around before, so I cant claim originality, just added to the theory is all.
The Durnford question really revolves around the time and space. When Durnford came back down the Quabe Valley a big piece of the left horn was chasing him, the reserve was behind on top of the hill to the west ( along the plateau ). So Everything happened after Durnford had passed with the exception that the beggings of the left horn/left chest was coming down the notch and running over the rocket Battery.
They, the left had a ways to travel and also got delayed by Durnford, possibly this would account for the statement ( cant recall by whom at this stage) that the chest was sitting down and waiting, I will look that quote up tomorrow unless anyone finds it first.

Congrats on USA getting to the last 16.

Cheers
Back to top Go down
old historian2

old historian2


Posts : 1093
Join date : 2009-01-14
Location : East London

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Jun 29, 2014 11:40 am

Just out of interest. How long didi it take Durnford to retreat back to the camp. He was roughly 6km out and taking into consideration the terrain posted by Springbok along with the firing at the advancing Zulus.
Back to top Go down
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Jun 29, 2014 2:55 pm

Hi OH
Curling says that around 12 he heard firing from Colonel Durnford. I need to do some research but I think he got back to the donga around 1 so the retreat would be an hour plus the length of time it took him to turn arounf after spotting the left horn, riding back a few hundred yards and getting into position for the first delaying volley. Call it around 70 to 80 minutes. He was slowed down on the return by the progressive volleys to delay the impi and also rescuing the RB survivors.
Interesting thing about that timing is that Essex also reports that he heard firing from the ridge at 12 oclock. So the two Horns were around an hour apart in arrival.
The plot thickens  Salute 
Back to top Go down
Dave

Dave


Posts : 1603
Join date : 2009-09-21

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Jun 29, 2014 9:46 pm

Looking at the Little Bighorn video posted by Admin on another thread, its a pity the men were not buried where they fell. We could have a better picture of what took place.
Back to top Go down
6pdr

6pdr


Posts : 1086
Join date : 2012-05-12
Location : NYC

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Jun 29, 2014 10:05 pm

springbok9 wrote:
So the two Horns were around an hour apart in arrival.

Oh they did, did they? Surprise, surprise, not all the timelines agree...  scratch 
Back to top Go down
Julian Whybra




Posts : 4175
Join date : 2011-09-12
Location : Billericay, Essex

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jun 30, 2014 5:35 pm

Springbok

Sorry to have had to wait a few days - a mad time working away from home I'm afraid.  Still, at odd moments it gave me the opportunity to reflect on what's been written.  There are two aspects to what you wrote.

The first is that the Loins came round to the western side of the mountain on the outside of the Zulu left horn as opposed to the outside of the right horn.  I have nothing against this in principle as a concept.  It may be just as valid as the opposing view.  I wrote earlier that the whole argument relating to Zulu regiments' positioning (even presence) is fraught.  I am as aware as anyone of the Henderson/Wood maps showing the reserve's route, more so, because it was David Jackson and I who found them.  We didn't highlight it at the time because the content of the Durnford Papers was, we felt, more important.  Eclipsing that was the famous 'X' marking the spot where the impi was allegedly found.  It seemed to us at the time that Henderson would know which regiments were in front of him; he might not have been so sure of those hidden behind the left horn and therefore that that part of the map might be supposition (especially as it went so much against an accepted [professionally] historical viewpoint going back to Coupland and beyond).  The maps are of course open to interpretation.  The Zulu participants' statements can also often be interpreted, as you say, in two ways.  For example, let's look at Uguku's remark:
"On our left we were supported by the Umbonambi, half the Undi, Ngobamakosi, and Uve."
Might not "half the Undi" be referring to the iNdluyengwe (part of that corps) despite the fact that at least some of them rejoined the corps and joined in with the RD attack?
Uguku also says:
"Behind us were the other half of the Undi and uDloko, who never came into action at Sandhlwana but formed the reserve (which passed on and attacked RD)."
Does "behind us" mean that they were behind them in the attack and that they followed them into the camp or does it mean that they were behind them in the bivouac or in the advance but that was all?
What we have in the accounts and in the map is ambiguity not clarification.  That said, I do not dispute that it is perfectly possible that the reserve did, as you say, sweep round to the east of Isandhlwana.  If so, then it gives rise to many new questions.  Why do so many of the European survivors say that they were constantly pushed to the left in their flight on the Fugitives' Trail?  If the Zulu reserve was approaching them from over Stony Koppie they would have been pushed to the right and might even have made their way circuitously back to the RD road.  
The whole question is an interesting one and deserves a thorough exploration (in more space and with more clarity than can be done within the restrictions of the forum).  In fact, as 'Cetewayo' mentioned, I am updating my original article on the Zulu army at Isandhlwana for inclusion in volume 3 of Studies in the Zulu War and so was intrigued when this very question came up on the forum as I've been going over it in my mind, so I joined in.  I honestly believe that this is not something one has to come down on one side or the other of.  It is an open question still with no certain answer.  I would want to do, and indeed am doing, much further in-depth examination of ALL the sources relating to it.

The second aspect of what you have proposed is that the left horn was over-inflated in size by including within it the uNdi and uDhloko (if they indeed did proceed in that direction).  This I believe will not hold water.  Following behind and in the same direction as the left horn does not mean that the reserve was PART of the left horn.  It WAS the loins and had a specific task to perform.  Sources, British and Zulu, are unanimous in stating that those two regiments had taken no part in Isandhlwana and was one of the reasons they moved on to RD to wash their spears.  
The one exception to this (apart from the aforementioned iNdluyengwe) might be the 2-300 men of the uThulwane I mentioned previously.  They may or may not have existed.  It is Donald Morris in TWOTS (1965), page 363, who mentions that a small number of them under Qetuka joined in the attack of the left horn, without having been so ordered.  I wrote to Morris back in the late 60s to ask him for his source and was told that he thought Qetuka's statement was in KCAL.  A request to KCAL brought forth a negative response - not surprising because at that time much of its contents were unindexed and in disarray.  Asking Morris for a copy of the statement got the response that all his research was packed away in his attic and he was not going to revisit them.  I tried the KCAL again in the 90s after the end of apartheid (a transition time in which chaos reigned for a while and things could go missing) only to be told that it held no such account.  Morris got his information from somewhere (though we know that he was not above creative elaboration when it suited him) so there might just be a Qetuka account floating about (perhaps it wasn't in KCAL but somewhere else).  No-one else mentions(-ed) this small group of uThulwane - why would Morris have bothered to do so if it were not genuine?  I can't answer this but I can't ignore it either.  (P.S.  Ransford's fictitious Zabange account which also mentions Qetuka's men was published in 1970 and was obviously lifted from Morris, so it can safely be ignored).  So, apart from this little question mark over Qetuka's small group of uThulwane there would have to be definite evidence that the whole uNdi/uDhloko participated in the actual left horn attack for your proposition to hold water and I don't think you've shown it (yet).

I am interested still.  I am still exploring these matters myself.  Sometimes in history it's all right to say I don't know or it's not yet possible to know the right answer and it's all right to say this is the evidence for A and this is the evidence for B - one or the other is true.  I have a strong feeling that this point about the loins will fit into this category.


Last edited by Julian Whybra on Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:14 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top Go down
John

John


Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 62
Location : UK

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jun 30, 2014 7:20 pm

If it took so long for the horns to meet, why was it not apparent to all, that the camp was being surrounded. I can't beleive out of all the officers there, they couldn't see it. They knew the traditional formation of the Zulus. Yet they stood oblivious to what was happening before their very eyes. I take it the Zulus seen disappering behind Isandlwana by Chard, Time approximately 0930 hrs by estimation. on his way back to RD we're the ones that killed Stepstone and co.
Back to top Go down
Chelmsfordthescapegoat

Chelmsfordthescapegoat


Posts : 2593
Join date : 2009-04-24

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jun 30, 2014 7:42 pm

Gents the document TMFH. Are we saying the maps are incorrect.
Back to top Go down
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 01, 2014 8:13 am

CTSG
In my opinion the original maps are correct, possibly/probably some of the deductions from the maps are subject to debate. I do believe portions of the TMFHT are correct, the positions of the impis etc, other portions are not so believable.
In terms of where the various regiments/amabuthu were that's really what Julian and I are chatting about at present and as you see from the various comments its pretty much open to speculation.

John
If your talking about the possibility of the reserve killing Shepstone I would say an emphatic no. IF I am right and the reserve was out on the plain they would not have gone near that area of the mountain. If tradition is right then again the reserve would have exited the ridge much further to the west so again no.

Julian

Thank you for the response, lots to consider there, I will get back to you later in the day.

Cheers
Back to top Go down
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 01, 2014 8:27 am

Julian
Ive spent some time going through the National Data Base and found this reference to Qetuka.

Document 4 of 8
DEPOT NAB
SOURCE SNA
TYPE LEER
VOLUME_NO I/1/313
SYSTEM 01
REFERENCE 1781/1904
PART 1
DESCRIPTION CIVIL COMMISSIONER ESHOWE CHIEFS DEATH OF CHIEF QETUKA.
STARTING 1904
ENDING 1904
REMARKS ZK894/1904, PB1083/1904, GH434/1904.


DEPOT KAB
SOURCE MOOC
TYPE LEER
VOLUME_NO 6/9/642
SYSTEM 01
REFERENCE 1259
PART 1
DESCRIPTION NOBANDA, JOHN QETUKA. DEATH NOTICE.
STARTING 19100000
ENDING 19100000

Document 6 of 8
DEPOT NAB
SOURCE 1/MEL
TYPE LEER
VOLUME_NO III/2/6
SYSTEM 01
REFERENCE PB453/1895
PART 1
DESCRIPTION ARTHUR SHEPSTONE, ENTONJANENI: RE- INTERVIEW BETWEEN CHIEF QETUKA
AND RESIDENT COMMISSIONER.
STARTING 18950000
ENDING 18950000

Let me see what I can do.

Cheers
Back to top Go down
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 01, 2014 9:57 am

Hi Julian
I fully agree every statement and the maps are wide open to interpretation with lots of grey areas so yes there are three options, yes, no and maybe.
If it was all so simple we would have given up talking about it years ago.
A case in point is your comment on why weren't the fugitives pushed towards the road by the reserve, if in fact they moved up to the South of Mahlabamkosi, I would suggest that Looking at Harry Davies account, when he was pushed back onto the saddle by the left horn and chest he witnessed the right horns movements and at the same time noted the 'reserve' still 2 miles away. That suggests to me that the two horns in fact did what they were supposed to do, almost, and were followed up much later by the reserve.

There are a few bits of information Im trying to get out of NAM at present and unfortunately Im not able to leave Cape Town for a while, there is the one reference to an interview with Arthur Shepstone I shall see if its possible for a local contact to try and obtain it for me.

Cheers
Back to top Go down
Julian Whybra




Posts : 4175
Join date : 2011-09-12
Location : Billericay, Essex

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 01, 2014 12:29 pm

CTSG
Whoever drew the maps believed they were correct (otherwise he wouldn't have drawn them). Whether they ARE (fully or partially) correct is another matter.

Springbok
Very well done with Qetuka. It'll be interesting to see what results.
Back to top Go down
impi

impi


Posts : 2308
Join date : 2010-07-02
Age : 44

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 01, 2014 5:27 pm

Deleted. Unnecessary comment and off topic.

Admin.
Back to top Go down
Ulundi

Ulundi


Posts : 558
Join date : 2012-05-05

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Jul 02, 2014 8:44 pm

For getting the capabilities of the MH rifle it's self! What about the capabilities of the men firing them.
Sergeant Major Davies reported to the conference on Martini-Henry rifles in 1873 that he ‘finds considerable recoil’ and that although he ‘has not seen men cut about the face, hands have been injured." The increased kick can certainly lead to inaccurate shooting, particularly amongst new recruits or nervous men and this was brought up by Lieutenant Sharp. ‘The recruits and bad shots complain but the men get used to it. Nervous men also complain.’The recoil is not shoulder breaking and the soldiers would have got used to it quickly. The recoil was perhaps a factor behind John Dunn’s remarks about the shooting of the British infantrymen at Gingindlovu explaining that ‘they were firing wildly in any direction.’ He goes further;

"I was much disappointed at the shooting of the soldiers. Their sole object seemed to be to get rid of ammunition or firing so many rounds a minute at anything, it didn’t matter what."
Back to top Go down
Ulundi

Ulundi


Posts : 558
Join date : 2012-05-05

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Jul 16, 2014 10:01 pm

Somewhat confused.

We have accounts form SD, stating he was handing out ammuntion from wagons and then claiming to be taking ammuntion to the firing lines. Yet reading through his other accounts, he then states.

Smith Dorrient wrote:
"Smith Dorrient. 
After the War the Zulus, who were delightfully naive and truthful people, told us that the fire was too hot for them and they were on the verge of retreat, when suddenly the fire slackened and on they came again. The reader will ask why the fire slackened, and the answer is, alas! because, with thousands of rounds in the wagons 400 yards in rear, there was none in the firing line ; all those had been used up"

"There was none in the firing lines, all those had been used up" I find this is some what a contradictory remark and more so how would he know?
Plus it verifies that ammuntion wasn't getting to the firing lines.
Back to top Go down
6pdr

6pdr


Posts : 1086
Join date : 2012-05-12
Location : NYC

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Jul 17, 2014 4:09 am

Ulundi wrote:
I find this is some what a contradictory remark and more so how would he know?
Plus it verifies that ammuntion wasn't getting to the firing lines.

AFAIK -- but happy to be corrected -- there are only 2 sources of comment by SD. One is a letter he wrote home directly after the battle from Helpmakaar and the other is his memoirs/autobiography written decades later. The letter home is very sketchy about the battle prior to his escape to safety, whereupon it becomes more vivid.

I believe what you are quoting is in the latter. I agree that SD's accounts are confusing. [Springbok has said the account of his progress to Fugitive's drift does not fit along with the others.] During the battle it's hard to pinpoint his movements. Horace claims to have both dispensed ammunition at a wagon AND brought it it to firing line...or was it just TOWARDS the firing line? Or did the firing line retreat back to where he was located? And was that location the ammunition wagon for the 2/24th (Bloomfield) or the 1/24th (Pullen)? Both possibly?

According to Lock & Quantrill his boss contradicts his timeline: "Yet, according to Essex, by this time Bloomfield had been shot dead. After twenty-eight years perhaps Smith-Dorrien had got Bloomfield mixed up with Quartermaster James Pullen of the 1/24th?...If that were the case, though, Smith-Dorrien would not have seen the end of the 'firing line,' having already made his escape." (p.326 of ZULU VICTORY)

And then we have the whole ammunition box controversy which pretty much begins and ends with his claim that they were maddeningly difficult to open. There is very little independent corroboration for that claim.

28 years is a long time when it comes to remembering...especially if you are living with survivor's guilt I would think.
Back to top Go down
90th

90th


Posts : 10909
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 68
Location : Melbourne, Australia

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: The Ammunition Question    The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Jul 17, 2014 8:22 am

Ulundi his name is Smith - Dorrien , not Smith - Dorrient  You need to study mo  . I dont have Smith - Dorrien's Memoirs , but it seems his letter , which 6pdr mentioned , written just after the Battle does vary with his account of 40 odd years later , Ian Knight for one , has mentioned this in his books , also Ian has mentioned in his publications that S-D is not the only one to have a differing account when asked many years later .
90th
Back to top Go down
Ulundi

Ulundi


Posts : 558
Join date : 2012-05-05

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Jul 17, 2014 8:35 am

What I posted from SD was not written to his father. If you read it correctly, it was aimed at the readers of his memoirs. Us!!
Back to top Go down
90th

90th


Posts : 10909
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 68
Location : Melbourne, Australia

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: The Ammunition Question    The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Jul 17, 2014 8:57 am

Ulundi YOU were the one who said you were confused !!  scratch  , I was merely attempting to say that S-D's recollection of events had changed from what he originally wrote , compared to his memoirs 40 or 50 years later ! . And that his name was Smith Dorrien not Smith Dorrient as you wrote ! .  scratch 
Back to top Go down
Julian Whybra




Posts : 4175
Join date : 2011-09-12
Location : Billericay, Essex

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyThu Jul 17, 2014 9:24 am

90th is quite correct in what he wrote. It only serve to show the extent to which modern-day researchers have to be careful when treating primary sources written decades after the event.
Back to top Go down
ADMIN

ADMIN


Posts : 4358
Join date : 2008-11-01
Age : 65
Location : KENT

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Jul 20, 2014 11:29 am

Back on topic!
Back to top Go down
https://www.1879zuluwar.com
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Jul 20, 2014 3:54 pm

" When i left the camp Colonel Durnford was still alive, as well
as a small remnant of the regulars, but they were so
hemmed in, that escape was impossible, and their ammunition
seemed expended, for Artillerymen were trying to break open
the cases on the wagons to supply them, but it was too late".
Back to top Go down
Chard1879

Chard1879


Posts : 1261
Join date : 2010-04-12

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Jul 20, 2014 4:27 pm

It's possible that SD was witnessing these certain events as he made is way around various locations of the battlefield. Seeing the remnants of the last stands, at which point there isn't really an ammuntion question to be asked.

And it's pure speculation that SD had memory problems in later life. Unless some one can show us medical records to suggest otherwise?
Back to top Go down
24th

24th


Posts : 1862
Join date : 2009-03-25

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptySun Jul 20, 2014 5:46 pm

Chard1879 wrote:
And it's pure speculation that SD had memory problems in later life. Unless some one can show us medical records to suggest otherwise?


"Among the many officers who established a great name in the period of small warfare before 1899, few had survived to participate in the Great War.   Some were well stricken in years; others had grown too senior in rank; several dropped out of the circle which was to staff the Army of 1914.   Sir Horace Smith-Dorrien was an exception.   With his still youthful physique, his personal qualities, technical knowledge, and experience, all claimed recognition.   He was a man of the Army who had lived with it and for it; he always knew the temper of his men in a manner that was given to few.   Moreover, he was not of those who had sat in Whitehall; apart from the short time he spent in India as Adjutant-General he had never been an "office soldier."   It is true that he had his weaknesses; his direct manner may have lacked grace; he may have been hot tempered; he could think of nothing but his troops except perhaps, of his racing ponies; he was no courtier; he did not aspire to figure as a heaven-sent soldier or administrator. But his soldierly merits were such that his name will surely live in the history of the British Army"

Taken from SD's obituary, posted By LH in another thread!
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 12:14 pm

Here is a portion of a letter from Frere to
Queen Vic, where he states LC's intention
to go out and attack the main Zulu army!.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 12:14 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 1:21 pm

Photo's courtesy of the 90th..

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 1:25 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 1:27 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 1:31 pm

But again i say LC did not take the
Ammunition, now i think that beyond
' fishy ' if he was going to confront
the main Zulu Army, what was he
going to fight with?....
Back to top Go down
6pdr

6pdr


Posts : 1086
Join date : 2012-05-12
Location : NYC

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 1:51 pm

Chard1879 wrote:
And it's pure speculation that SD had memory problems in later life.

Yes, but it's also true that aspects of his two accounts contradicted many others and even himself to little discernible purpose. It is also a fact that eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable to begin with. It is also a fact that people in general tend to show significant memory deterioration as they age. So, raising the POSSIBILITY that he mistaken in some details decades later is an entirely reasonable line of inquiry.
Back to top Go down
6pdr

6pdr


Posts : 1086
Join date : 2012-05-12
Location : NYC

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 1:59 pm

xhosa2000 wrote:
But again i say LC did not take the
Ammunition, now i think that beyond
' fishy ' if he was going to confront
the main Zulu Army, what was he
going to fight with?....

Oh, this is even LESS credible than most things Frere said and did. He was clearly willing to say whatever was necessary to save his skin after the disaster. Mostly this is an attempt to pin the tail on a donkey named Durnford. If you don't credit that (and I certainly don't) then why would you take seriously Frere's contention that Chelmsford EXPECTED a 15-20K Zulu army? Either LC didn't expect it or he couldn't do simple maths. What motive had he to get himself and his entire command potentially wiped out?
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 2:51 pm

i offered the above without prejudice!
merely to point out 1. Chelmsford's stated intention to confront
the whole of the Zulu Army at the first opportunity, and 2, the
bottom line ties in with the ammunition thread! again i have to
say to you STOP trying to second guess my intentions, who said
he was trying to get himself and his entire command wiped out!
stop being so literal.....i'm merely adding to the mix in order for
people to think and then question this campaign more closely!!

on the S-D thread re the photograph, stop going on.... this is not a
COMPETITION!!! just post the thing. s..t or get off the pot. last thing
6pdr. Step off me! i'm really not as interested as you seem to be!.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 10:27 pm

Back to top Go down
6pdr

6pdr


Posts : 1086
Join date : 2012-05-12
Location : NYC

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 21, 2014 11:23 pm

OK, so I have a question. For those (colonials etc...) not seeking Martini Henry ammo (because they were armed with carbines or what have you) would the battalion ammunition wagons have any useful rounds?

And, if they did have bullets useful for rifles other than the MH, would those rounds even be stored in British Army mahogony/teak boxes?
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 56
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 7:59 am

I think this has been asked before, and the answer was no, the British wagons contain MH rounds only. Durfords wagons would have held their own supplies. Happy to be corrected.

But no doubt during the course of the Battle, colonials may have picked up the odd MH rifle that had been lost to a dead soldier.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 11:13 am

I posted that old footage for those not familiar with a
close view of an ammunition box! please look carefully
at the box, the Sandhurst geezer tells us that it came
straight off the battlefield! and then proceeded to show
the difficulty of accessing the contents...dramatically
pointing out the ' bayonet ' marks?.

And now consider where these boxes were to be found,
certainly not on the firing line! so then please consider
the range of tools readily available to hand in camp!
the list becomes very long, forgetting the pioneers..
there were. pickaxes, axes, jemmys, crowbars, steel
levering bars?, rifle butts, steel shod ammunition boots.
and of course the ' screwdrivers '.

the ' historian ' makes a big deal about the bayonet thrust
marks ( incidentaly from the wrong side ) and goes on to
show that by removing ONE screw the sliding panel can
be easily accessed! again a big deal is made out of the
QM's role in this battle, stressing the professionalism of
that breed of men, accounting for every round and indeed
every spent cartridge case...

Now note the various timings! all was good as long as the front
line held and Durnford was doing his thing out on the right,
springbok contends that there was no sudden collapse
( despite the the blame shifted immediately to the poor
maligned NNC..) NO! this was an orderly withdrawal back onto
the camp, which must be why so many of the lasts stands held
out as long as they did because they had ammunition......

The Zulu were paused and laid down under the intense fire of
the Martinis, we know after the bravest of rallying calls the Zulu
rose up and came on with even more fanatical determination and
bravery...what was the high command doing at this point, i'm
thinking of Pulleine with Melvill as his eyes and ears..they were
watching the battle unfold, they had noted the way the Zulu
were coming on! ( unlike any thing they had seen all their time in
Africa! ) and at some point sounded the recall! ( once, twice?.
What did they actually see to make that decision? they saw up
to fifteen thousand highly disciplined and motivated troops ( yes
they were troop's!) advancing and it seemed like nothing could stop
them! if they could see that! who else could..and how many were
actual effective's in camp, how many actual fighting men, my own
estimate is a very generous 750 to 800..i cannot believe the QM's
were not acutely aware of the situation at this time as those with
no business with the actual fighting were not so quietly making
good their preparations for flight. i sincerely believe that there was
No Ammunition shortage..but the 24th and colonials were
simply ground down by overwhelming force!.. but the british could
not stomach the fact that an indigenous force had out general'd
and outfought them! so the ' spin began ' ammunition shortage at
Isandhlwana? err no! there was a tactic and ultimately troop
shortage. this is of course just my own opinion! i wont be about
to change it any time soon..

Back to top Go down
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 11:21 am

"springbok contends that there was no sudden collapse
( despite the the blame shifted immediately to the poor
maligned NNC..) "
 agree 
Back to top Go down
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 12:18 pm

Julian Cetshwayo
A couple of pages back we were discussing uniforms and numbers.
Possibly this may assist
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
6pdr

6pdr


Posts : 1086
Join date : 2012-05-12
Location : NYC

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 2:27 pm

littlehand wrote:
I think this has been asked before, and the answer was no, the British wagons contain MH rounds only. Durfords wagons would have held their own supplies.

Well the reason I ask is that much is made of the couriers (for lack of a better word) that Durnford dispatched back to secure more ammunition were supposed to have been refused rounds at the battalion wagons, but it wasn't there for them anyway as their men were armed with Sniders or what have you...

In other words, much has been made of the refusal (this is separate from Smith-Dorrien's story now,) to issue ammunition for the men in the donga but without knowledge of where their wagon was located (for it arrived late to the battlefield,) that was pretty much academic anyway?


Last edited by 6pdr on Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 3:45 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 4:00 pm

This Ulundi, but it perfectly illustrates how the Zulu
' Came On ' in battle..

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
impi

impi


Posts : 2308
Join date : 2010-07-02
Age : 44

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 9:32 pm

6pdr wrote:
littlehand wrote:
I think this has been asked before, and the answer was no, the British wagons contain MH rounds only. Durfords wagons would have held their own supplies.

Well the reason I ask is that much is made of the couriers (for lack of a better word) that Durnford dispatched back to secure more information were supposed to have been refused rounds at the battalion wagons, but it wasn't there for them anyway as their men were armed with Sniders or what have you...

In other words, much has been made of the refusal (this is separate from Smith-Dorrien's story now,) to issue ammunition for the men in the donga but without knowledge of where their wagon was located (for it arrived late to the battlefield,) that was pretty much academic anyway?

I'm not sure Durnfords troops were replenished, can't think of his name of hand, but one of the Coloinals rode in, to find the ammuntion boxes had not been opened. But in-hind sight the Coloinals still could have supplied MH ammo to the firing lines albeit for British, quicker being on horseback.
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 56
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyTue Jul 22, 2014 10:03 pm

Springbok, came across this!
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
cetewayo

cetewayo


Posts : 24
Join date : 2012-05-30
Location : United States

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Jul 23, 2014 6:00 am

springbok9 wrote:
Julian Cetshwayo
A couple of pages back we were discussing uniforms and numbers.
Possibly this may assist
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Thanks Springbok.

Aren't these lists the ones compiled by Fynney?
Back to top Go down
90th

90th


Posts : 10909
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 68
Location : Melbourne, Australia

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: The Ammunition Question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Jul 23, 2014 6:58 am

Hi Springy
These lists you posted are also in ' The Zulu Army And Zulu Headmen ' . Inside the front cover it states ' Compiled from Information obtained from the most reliable sources ' ; and Published ' By Direction Of The Lieut - Gen Commanding ' -
For the Information Of Those Under His Command ; Which I'm certain was compiled with help from Fynney , it's also as it states , the book handed to the Column commanders before the invasion , from memory these were distributed in Dec 78 ? .
90th
Back to top Go down
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Jul 23, 2014 8:08 am

These are the original lists drawn up by I believe Fynney. There were donated to the archives by C Faye who was head of Natal Bantu Affairs Department.
I know they have been incorporated into all sorts of books but on occasion its nice to see the original documents. In terms of research its always better to go back to the source documents rather than relying on authors interpretations.

Cheers
Back to top Go down
90th

90th


Posts : 10909
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 68
Location : Melbourne, Australia

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: The Ammunition Question    The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Jul 23, 2014 8:15 am

Hi Springy
Yes agreed , it's always best to get your hands on the Originals , they would take on a persona of their own , due to my lack of a better word !  No . It seems it's also the Originals which are indeed in the book I mentioned  Salute You need to study mo 
Cheers 90th  Very Happy 
Back to top Go down
Frank Allewell

Frank Allewell


Posts : 8572
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 77
Location : Cape Town South Africa

The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Jul 23, 2014 8:27 am

agree 
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




The ammunition question - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 2 EmptyWed Jul 23, 2014 11:12 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
 
The ammunition question
Back to top 
Page 2 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Similar topics
-
» The Ammuntion Box Question.
» Just a fun question
» The ammunition question

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM  :: GENERAL DISCUSSION AREA-
Jump to: