Latest topics | » Did Ntishingwayo really not know Lord C wasn't at home Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:05 am by Tig Van Milcroft » Dr. A. Ralph BusbySun Nov 17, 2024 11:25 pm by Julian Whybra » Lieutenant M.G. Wales, 1st Natal Native ContingentSat Nov 16, 2024 12:32 pm by Matthew Turl » Colonel Edward William Bray, 2nd/4th Regt.Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:55 pm by Julian Whybra » Royal Marine Light Infantry, ChathamThu Nov 14, 2024 7:57 pm by Petty Officer Tom » H.M.S. ForesterThu Nov 14, 2024 4:07 pm by johnex » Samuel PoppleWed Nov 13, 2024 8:43 am by STEPHEN JAMES » Studies in the Zulu War volume VI now availableSat Nov 09, 2024 6:38 pm by Julian Whybra » Colonel Charles Knight PearsonFri Nov 08, 2024 5:56 pm by LincolnJDH » Grave of Henry SpaldingThu Nov 07, 2024 8:10 pm by 1879graves » John West at KambulaThu Nov 07, 2024 5:25 pm by MKalny15 » Private Frederick Evans 2/24thSun Nov 03, 2024 8:12 pm by Dash » How to find medal entitlement CokerSun Nov 03, 2024 10:51 am by Kev T » Isandlwana Casualty - McCathie/McCarthySat Nov 02, 2024 1:40 pm by Julian Whybra » William Jones CommentFri Nov 01, 2024 6:07 pm by Eddie » Brother of Lt YoungFri Nov 01, 2024 5:13 pm by Eddie » Frederick Marsh - HMS TenedosFri Nov 01, 2024 9:48 am by lydenburg » Mr Spiers KIA iSandlwana ?Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:50 am by Julian Whybra » Isandhlwana unaccounted for casualtiesFri Nov 01, 2024 7:48 am by Julian Whybra » Thrupps report to Surgeon General Wolfies Thu Oct 31, 2024 12:32 pm by Julian Whybra » Absence of Vereker from Snook's BookFri Oct 25, 2024 10:59 pm by Julian Whybra » Another Actor related to the Degacher-Hitchcock familyMon Oct 21, 2024 1:07 pm by Stefaan » No. 799 George Williams and his son-in-law No. 243 Thomas NewmanSat Oct 19, 2024 12:36 pm by Dash » Alphonse de Neuville- Painting the Defence of Rorke's DriftFri Oct 18, 2024 8:34 am by Stefaan » Studies in the Zulu War volumesWed Oct 16, 2024 3:26 pm by Julian Whybra » Martini Henry carbine IC1 markingsMon Oct 14, 2024 10:48 pm by Parkerbloggs » James Conner 1879 claspMon Oct 14, 2024 7:12 pm by Kenny » 80th REG of Foot (Staffords)Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:07 pm by shadeswolf » Frontier Light Horse uniformSun Oct 13, 2024 8:12 pm by Schlaumeier » Gelsthorpe, G. 1374 Private 1/24th / Scott, Sidney W. 521 Private 1/24thSun Oct 13, 2024 1:00 pm by Dash » A Bullet BibleSat Oct 12, 2024 8:33 am by Julian Whybra » Brothers SearsFri Oct 11, 2024 7:17 pm by Eddie » Zulu War Medal MHS TamarFri Oct 11, 2024 3:48 pm by philip c » Ford Park Cemetery, Plymouth.Tue Oct 08, 2024 4:15 pm by rai » Shipping - transport in the AZWSun Oct 06, 2024 10:47 pm by Bill8183 |
November 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
New topics | » Dr. A. Ralph BusbySat Nov 16, 2024 11:36 am by Julian Whybra » Colonel Edward William Bray, 2nd/4th Regt.Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:49 pm by John Young » Samuel PoppleTue Nov 12, 2024 3:36 pm by STEPHEN JAMES » Colonel Charles Knight PearsonFri Nov 08, 2024 5:56 pm by LincolnJDH » John West at KambulaMon Nov 04, 2024 11:54 pm by MKalny15 » How to find medal entitlement CokerFri Nov 01, 2024 9:32 am by Kev T » Frederick Marsh - HMS TenedosThu Oct 31, 2024 1:42 pm by lydenburg » Did Ntishingwayo really not know Lord C wasn't at home Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:18 am by SRB1965 » Thrupps report to Surgeon General Wolfies Sun Oct 27, 2024 11:32 am by SRB1965 |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
|
| The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:00 pm | |
| The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana...
1st Battalion 24th Regiment of Foot – 16 & 398
OC – Lt. Col. Henry Pulleine; Adjt – Lt. Teignmouth Melvill; Paymaster – Hon. Maj. Francis White; QM – Quartermaster James Pullen; Sergeant Major Frederick Gapp; Quartermaster Sergeant Thomas Leitch.
• A Coy – Capt. Wm. Degacher, Lt. Francis Porteous.
( Degacher had been the acting battalion commander until the arrival on 17 January of Lt. Col. Henry Pulleine.He had certainly been accorded the acting rank of major up to that point, but we cannot be sure whether or not he had reverted to his substantive rank with Pulleine’s arrival)
• C Coy – Capt. Reginald Younghusband, Lt. George Hodson. • E Coy – Lt. Charles Cavaye, 2nd Lt. Edwards [sic] Dyson. • F Coy – Capt Wm. Mostyn, Lt. Patrick Daly, Lt. Edgar Anstey. • H Coy – Capt. George Wardell, Lt. Charles Atkinson. • Lt. Nevill Coghill (serving on the column staff, but injured and left behind at the camp). • Band. • Pioneer Section – Cpl. Richardson and 5-8 others. • 6 man detail 90th Regt. attached [not included in 398 OR strength].
G Company and Rear Details 2nd Battalion 24th Regiment of Foot – 5 & 171
Adjt – Lt. Henry Dyer; Tpt Officer - Sub-Lt. Thomas Griffith; QM – Quartermaster Edward Bloomfield; Quartermaster Sergeant George Davis. • G Coy – Lt. Charlie Pope, Lt. Fred Godwin-Austen (2 officers and about 80-90 ORs). • Battalion Guard Detail; 1 x section of A Coy (say 20-25 men). • 6 x company rear parties (left behind to watch tents and kits). Say 4 men per coy (or 1 man per section) = 24 ORs • Bandmaster Harry Bullard and 3 boy-bandsmen. • Pioneer section (Cpl and 7-8 others). • Officer’s batmen and other miscellaneous rear details.
Notes on the Internal Organization of a British Line Infantry Battalion in 1879.
A regular army battalion of 1879 was commanded by a lieutenant colonel (who might well,during the course of his 5-year command tour, receive promotion by seniority to the rank of full colonel), and consisted of a small headquarters and administrative staff, a band and eight companies lettered A to H.
The battalion was sub-divided into 2 x four-company wings - namely the right wing consisting of A-D Companies, and the left wing consisting of E-H Companies.
There were two majors in the battalion who each commanded one of the wings.
The senior of the pair was designated the ‘senior major’ and was the de-facto second-in-command.
Like the colonel and the adjutant, the wing commanders were ‘field officers’ and, as such, were mounted at the taxpayer’s expense.
Before leaving the subject of majors, it should be noted that Francis White of the 1st/24th, KIA at Isandlwana, was the paymaster – or an ‘honorary’ major in other words.
While such officers enjoyed the status and standing of their nominal rank, they did not count as line officers and were deemed not to be qualified to command troops in the field.
It was usual for an Army Medical Department (AMD) Surgeon (captain equivalent) to be attached to an infantry battalion.
The 1st/24th’s doctor was Surgeon James Henry Reynolds, who had been left behind at the behest of the Principal Medical Officer (PMO) to run the base hospital at Rorke’s Drift.
The eight companies were commanded by captains, who each had two subaltern officers to assist them.
It was not uncommon, however, for a number of the captains to be absent on long leave, detached staff duty and such like, and for their companies to be in the charge of the most senior lieutenants.
The senior non-commissioned man in the company being its colour sergeant, who combined the functions of CSM and CQMS in one post.
The companies were divided into four sections, each of them commanded by a sergeant with a full corporal as his second-in-command.
The number of lance corporals was broadly comparable to the number of corporals, so one per section, on occasion two, would be the general rule of thumb.
Two sections could be grouped together to form a half-company under the command of one of the subaltern officers.
Typically the average strength of a company in the field fluctuated between about 75 and 90 all ranks, so something between 16-20 privates per section would be fairly typical.
There was also one pioneer per company who usually paraded under the battalion pioneer corporal to give a composite pioneer section of nine.
There were also one or two ‘drummers’ per company, who drummed on parade but actually bugled in the field.
Last, but not least, to the most senior non-commissioned men in the battalion,in 1879 , there was only one sergeant major – known accordingly as the Sergeant Major.
In 1879 the Quartermaster’s right hand man was known as the Quartermaster-Sergeant, or QMS, who ranked as the second senior soldier after the Sergeant Major.
The dress of the infantry.
The issued rig was the white leather 1871 valise pattern equipment, which tended to be worn complete on the march, but which was stripped down to a waist-belt rig for the rest of the time.
This consisted of the waist-belt itself, the left and right ammunition pouches, the Pattern 1876 ‘lunger’ bayonet and frog, and the expense-pouch or ‘ball bag’.
This was worn with the ‘Oliver’ pattern water-bottle and a white canvas haversack slung over opposite shoulders.
Ammunition for the .450 in. Martini-Henry rifle came in waxed paper packets of ten cartridges (with 60 packets to the ammunition box).
The waxed paper packaging protected the cartridge from water ingress during rain, at river crossings or the damp and dew of picket duty.
Some 70 rounds were customarily carried on the person – two sealed packets in each of the ammunition pouches, two more in the haversack, (or in the valise on the march), and one packet broken open ready for use and carried loose in the expense-pouch.
The Quartermaster kept a further 30 rounds a man close at hand as the battalion’s first line reserve.
Curling’s Division, ‘’ Battery, 5th Brigade Royal Artillery – 2 & 71
‘N’ Battery was a horse-drawn field battery under the command of Brevet Lieutenant Colonel Arthur Harness who was upcountry with Lord Chelmsford and did not participate in the fighting around the camp.
The battery was divided into three divisions, each of two guns,under the command of a lieutenant.
Individual gun detachments were commanded by a sergeant.
Technically the guns themselves were not actually field guns, though they were utilised as such, but rather 7-pounder mountain guns mounted for field service on locally manufactured ‘Kaffrarian’ carriages.
Of the battery’s three divisions, only Lieutenant Henry Curling’s division was present at Isandlwana.
The battery captain, or second in command,Brevet Major Stuart Smith went out with Colonel Harness, but arrived back at the camp just in time to participate in the battle and lose his life.
The battery’s rear details, a combination of drivers, orderlies, farriers, saddlers, armourers and so on, had also been left behind at the camp, so that in total the Royal Artillery fielded two officers and 71 other ranks.
The gunners and drivers were individually armed with revolvers and sabres, while the regulation provision of carbines was only two per gun-crew.
The battery may in practice have acquired a few more rifles and carbines for local defence over the course of its service in the recent 9th Cape Frontier War.
Composite Detail, No. 1 Squadron Imperial Mounted Infantry (IMI) – 0 & 31
The mounted infantry had been raised to make up for the shortfall of regular cavalry in South Africa.
The squadron was mounted on local horses and armed with carbines in lieu of their Martini-Henry rifles.
The soldiers retained their foreign-service helmets and regimental tunics, but were issued with Bedford cord breeches, riding boots and a brown leather ammunition bandolier.
They retained their haversacks and Oliver pattern water-bottles but discarded the rest of their valise pattern equipment for mounted service.
No 1 Squadron was a composite grouping drawn from four of the eight imperial infantry battalions serving in South Africa at the time, namely detachments of the 2nd/3rd (Buffs), the 1st/24th, the 1st/13th Light Infantry and the 80th Regiment.
All of the squadron’s officers and 80 of the other ranks were upcountry with Lord Chelmsford’s force, leaving only 31 men at the camp.
As the name suggests, the mounted infantry invariably dismounted to fight, telling off one man in four as horse-holders.
Major Russell’s Rocket Battery – 1 & 9
The rather grandly named rocket battery was part of Colonel Anthony Durnford’s No 2 Column.
It was commanded by Brevet Major Francis Russell RA and fielded three 9-pounder rocket troughs.
Bombardier George Goff provided supervised 8 private soldiers detached from the 1st/24th’s C Company.
The battery’s troughs, rockets and other paraphernalia were mule-borne.
Detachment, Natal Mounted Police (MP) – 0 & 34
The NMP was the quasi-military constabulary of colonial Natal, and been formed by an exregular army major by the name of John Dartnell.
The police came into the field sufficiently strong, at a little under 120 officers and men, to operate as a tactical entity.
Major Dartnell and Inspector George Mansel had taken 80 men upcountry with Lord Chelmsford and left 34 men behind at the camp.
As was the case with all the mounted units, the rear details were a mixture of administrators and men whose horses were already lame or played out and in need of time to recuperate.
The police wore a white helmet, adorned with a silver spike, and plain black breeches and trousers.
Detachments of Mounted Volunteers
After the IMI and NMP, the third ‘cavalry squadron’ deployed by No. 3 Column, was a composite one made up of three smaller volunteer units.
These were The Natal Carbineers, the Newcastle Mounted Rifles and The Buffalo Border Guard.
The Natal Carbineers (NC) - 2 & 27
The senior volunteer unit in the colony, the NC was regarded as a fashionable outfit, and tended to draw its membership from amongst the sons of the more prosperous families in Pietermaritzburg.
The unit was commanded was Captain Theophilus Shepstone, ‘Offy’ to his friends, a son of the well known colonial administrator, Sir Theophilus.
Left behind at the camp were Lieutenant Durrant Scott, one other officer and 27 other ranks. Scott was the OIC of the mounted vedettes thrown out around Isandlwana on the day of the battle.
The Carbineers wore a white foreign-service helmet, with navy blue tunics faced in white at the collar and cuffs, and matching breeches with a broad white stripe down the outside seam.
Like the NMP and the other volunteer units, the Carbineers were armed with revolvers and carbines and sustained themselves from haversacks, 50-round bandoliers and Oliver pattern water-bottles.
The Newcastle Mounted Rifles (MR) – 2 & 12.
The NMR had been raised in the nearby frontier town of that name and was commanded by Captain Robert Bradstreet.
The unit was dressed after the fashion of rifle volunteers in black-braided rifle green tunics and breeches.
Bradstreet had sent 20 of his NCOs and troopers out with a Lieutenant C. Jones and stayed behind at Isandlwana with one other officer and 12 other ranks.
Whether by accident or design he was the senior officer of volunteers at the camp and would exercise overall command of the white mounted troops.
The Buffalo Border Guard (BBG) - 1 & 7
The BBG, commanded by Captain W.C. Smith, was the smallest of the volunteer units, being drawn from amongst the farmers scattered up and down the Buffalo River frontier with Zululand; the late Jim Rorke, for example, had risen to be the unit’s lieutenant.
The principal concern of the BBG had been the deterrence of stock theft. Mustered now for war, the farmers were smartly turned out in white helmets and braided black tunics and breeches.
They would thus have been indistinguishable from the NMP at any great distance.
Smith had joined Lord Chelmsford with 16 other ranks, leaving Quartermaster MacPhail and 7 other ranks behind at the camp.
The Natal Native Contingent (NNC)
In order not to fritter away his already thinly stretched imperial infantry battalions, Lord Chelmsford had pressed the colonial authorities to levy a strong auxiliary force from amongst the tribes and clans of Natal.
It was intended for screens, pickets, guards, outposts, reconnaissance, labour, convoy escorts, raiding, pursuit and such like.
Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Durnford RE had been the principal architect of the NNC.
The NNC was led by European officers and NCOs who, for the most part, had been brought up by Lord Chelmsford from the frontier towns of the Eastern Cape.
While some of the whites had been levy leaders in the Ninth Frontier War against the Xhosa, others were little more than colonial drifters with no military experience to speak of.
Because they were from so far afield, there were very few who could speak Zulu – Natal’s principal native tongue and the language of their men.
NNC battalions consisted of ten companies and were around 1100 strong.
The OIC was known as the ‘Commandant’.
Companies were commanded by captains, with two lieutenants and six NCOs to assist.
This meant that there were close to a hundred Europeans per battalion - and Chelmsford had opted to raise no fewer than seven battalions; hence, (with most of Natal’s younger sons already enlisted in the mounted volunteer units), the necessity to ship the extra manpower up from the Cape.
The Europeans were armed with Martinis, full bandoliers of ammunition and, in the case of the NCOs, bayonets.
There were one hundred native levies per company, of whom only ten had been issued with a firearm.
It was often the case, though not the invariable rule, that there were five modern Martinis and five obsolescent Snider-Enfields per company.
The African riflemen were provided with only five rounds of ammunition apiece.
This was a function, not of crass stupidity on Lord Chelmsford’s part, as is so often portrayed, but of the reticence of the government of Natal to see the colony’s black population equipped with firearms by the military.
The 10% scaling represented a compromise solution, and Chelmsford had no real choice but to sign up to it.
The balance of the men turned out with their traditional tribal weapons, assegais, knobkerries and cowhide shields.
Some wore hats and odd items of discarded European clothing but, for the most part, the only thing that distinguished them from their Zulu cousins was a red rag worn wrapped around the head-ring or the upper arm.
All the men had been issued with a blanket which they wore rolled over one shoulder.
The GOC had directed that the NNC be drilled in imitation of regular troops, but given the language barrier, the shortage of time for training and the incompetence of many of the Europeans, the learning curve was simply far too steep.
Some white NCOs resorted all too frequently to verbal and physical abuse in a vain attempt to make themselves understood.
Because their parade ground manoeuvres always seemed to go horribly wrong, to the evident ire and frustration of their white leaders, any belief the levies may once have had in their ability to meet the Zulu in open battle quickly ebbed away.
Morale in the contingent was soon at a low ebb and was reflected in its battlefield performance.
In all, seven companies of NNC, drawn from three battalions, were involved in the battle of Isandlwana.
Both the 1st and 2nd Battalions of Commandant Rupert Lonsdale’s 3rd Regiment,20companies in all, had been assigned to the Central Column.
Lonsdale had taken 16 of his companies out of camp on the morning of 21 January, to conduct a reconnaissance in force over the difficult ground to the right front of the camp.
Thus each battalion left behind two companies to fulfil its picket commitments – its duty company for 21 January, and the company ‘next for duty’ the following day.
A fifth company was sent back by Lonsdale as an escort to the livestock captured during the course of his foray.
The sixth and seventh NNC sub-units involved in the battle were from the 1st Battalion of 1st Regiment NNC and marched in with Colonel Anthony Durnford’s command on the morning of the fight.
These two companies were 50% stronger than their 3rd Regiment counterparts, because Durnford had temporarily disbanded a third company and dispersed its manpower between them.
So it was that the seven companies listed below came to be present at Isandlwana on 22 January.
It should be noted that the strengths given below represent the total battalion strength in the camp and that they appear in the order European officers/European NCOs/African levies:
1st/1st C - 5/18/300 • D Coy – Capt. C. Nourse • E Coy – Capt. W.H. Stafford
1st/3rd C - 11/31/200 • No. 6 Coy – Capt. R. Krohn • No. 9 Coy – Capt. J.F. Lonsdale3
2nd/3 rd C - 9/28/300 • No. 1 Coy – Capt. O.E. Murray • No. 4 Coy – Capt. E. A. Erskine • No. 5 Coy – Capt. A.J. Barry
The Natal Native Horse(NNH) – 6 & 257
In addition to the seven NNC battalions, Durnford also raised a 6-troop regiment of Natal native horse which was referred to as the Natal Native Mounted Contingent - or ‘the Mounted Contingent’ for short.
It is quite commonplace to hear the unit referred to as Durnford’s Basutos , but this designation is incorrect: only one of the six troops was of Basuto origin.
It should be noted that the first three troops of the NNH were recruited from the amaNgwane clan and were known collectively as Zikhali’s Horse – in effect a unit within a unit.
Durnford brought only five of his NNH troops up to the camp on the morning of the battle - the sixth, Jantze’s Horse, having been left behind at the ‘Middle Drift’ on the Tugela some days earlier.
Each troop was around 50 strong and was commanded by a white lieutenant.
The NCOs were all black Africans.
Captain William Barton was the sixth and most senior NNH officer, in effect the ‘regimental’ commander, though in practice Durnford himself had pretty much assumed that role after Lord Chelmsford’s recent de facto dissolution of No. 2 Column.
The troopers of the NNH were issued with carbines and a bandolier of 50 rounds of ammunition.
Many of them also armed themselves with throwing assegais which they tended to carry in a ‘quiver’ worn slung over their backs .
They were turned out in European clothing and hats but, for the most part, rolled their trousers to the knee and rode their ponies barefoot.
The exception to the latter rule was the hymn-singing No. 5 Troop, recruited from the Edendale mission near Pietermaritzburg, which liked to think of itself as a cut above the rest and was booted and spurred.
The five NNH troops at Isandlwana were:
• No. 1 Troop – Lt. C. Raw } • No. 2 Troop – Lt. J.A. Roberts } (Zikhali’s Horse) • No 3 Troop – Lt. W. Vause } • No 4 Troop – Lt. A. H. Henderson (Hlubi’s Basutos). • No 5 Troop – Lt. H.D. Davies (The Edendale Troop)
Summary of Unit Strengths .
Column Staff 7 & 11 HQ and 5 x Coys 1st/24th 16 & 398 90th Regt (att 1st/24th) 0 & 6 G Coy and Rear Details 2nd/24th 5 & 171 N Battery, 5th Bde, RA (2 x 7 pdrs) 2 & 71 Rocket Battery 1 & 9 RE 2 & 5 No 1 Sqn Imperial Mounted Infantry 0 & 31 NMP 0 & 34 NC 2 & 27 NMR 2 & 12 BBG 1 & 7 2 x Coys 1st/1st NNC 5 & 318 2 x Coys 1st/3rd NNC 11 & 231 3 x Coys 2nd/3rd NNC 9 & 328 5 x Troops NNMC 6 & 257 Army Service Corps (ASC) 0 & 4 Army Hospital Corps (AHC) 1 & 10 Army Medical Department (AMD) 1 & 0 Native Pioneers 1 & 10 Black African voorloopers, grooms et Unknown but approx 300 approx White civilian contractors, interpreters etc Unknown but estimated 2-3 doz
Cheers
Pascal
Total [not including civilians] 71 & 1,940 [approx] |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:30 am | |
| Hello
No comments?
So there are no errors ...
Good for wargamers ...
"Merci mon colonel"
Cheers
Pascal |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:51 am | |
| Porteous Vereker at a quick glance. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:01 pm | |
| Hi Sprinbok9
It Porteous who commanded the Company A of the 1/24 th ?
Vereker commanded a company of NNC?
Cheers
Pascal |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:01 pm | |
| Even Julian finds no error in my topic? :lol: |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:32 pm | |
| Bonsoir à tous
After Julian
Degacher was the field officer at Isandhlwana. See my note 1 on page 4 England's Sons. IMI had 22 men at Isandhlwana not 31. NNC 1st/1st should be 6 officers 249 ORs.
Cheers
Pascal |
| | | ADMIN
Posts : 4358 Join date : 2008-11-01 Age : 65 Location : KENT
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:08 pm | |
| Pascal. Please name your source...
I take it this is your source: http://www.empressminiatures.com/BritishForces.pdf |
| | | Drummer Boy 14
Posts : 2008 Join date : 2011-08-01 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:35 pm | |
| I think he is naming England Son's |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:26 am | |
| HI all
It is a mixture of both ...
And it is, to correct ...
Cheers
Pascal |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:42 am | |
| Hi all
In any case the two books of Julian are too great, it gives numbers of troops often have nothing to do with what we find in other books, even the numbers given by Rothwell do I have less confidence now ...
Cheers
Pascal |
| | | | The Composition of the British Force at Isandhlwana... | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |